PharmD Info

Pharmacy education has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, with an increased emphasis on experiential learning. As a result, two popular methods of training PharmD students have emerged: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and simulations. Both approaches offer unique benefits, but which is the best way to train PharmD students?

OSCEs are a widely used method of evaluating clinical skills, where students rotate through a series of stations, each with a different scenario, and are assessed on their ability to perform specific tasks. OSCEs are typically standardized, meaning that all students are evaluated on the same skills and competencies. OSCEs provide a high level of reliability and validity in assessing clinical skills and are used to ensure that all students have achieved a certain level of proficiency.

Simulations, on the other hand, are immersive experiences that simulate real-world scenarios. Simulations can take many forms, from virtual reality to tabletop exercises, and allow students to apply their knowledge and skills in a safe, controlled environment. Simulations are designed to be realistic and provide opportunities for students to practice critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. Simulations can also be tailored to specific learning objectives, making them a flexible and versatile tool for pharmacy education.

While both OSCEs and simulations offer benefits for training PharmD students, the choice between the two ultimately depends on the learning objectives and the specific needs of the student. OSCEs are ideal for assessing clinical skills and competencies and are useful for ensuring that all students have achieved a certain level of proficiency. Simulations, on the other hand, are excellent for building clinical reasoning skills and providing a safe, controlled environment for students to practice complex clinical scenarios.

Moreover, simulations can be more engaging and interactive, which can help to enhance learning and retention of material. Simulations can be designed to simulate real-world experiences, which can make them more memorable and impactful for students. Additionally, simulations can be repeated and modified to provide ongoing learning opportunities and to reinforce concepts that are difficult to understand.

Here are some differences between OSCEs and simulations presented in a table format:


While there are similarities between OSCEs and simulations, such as their focus on experiential learning, there are also notable differences that can impact their effectiveness for training PharmD students. Educators must carefully consider their learning objectives and the specific needs of their students when choosing which method to use. By weighing the pros and cons of each approach, educators can create a comprehensive learning experience that meets the needs of their students.

In conclusion, both OSCEs and simulations have unique benefits for training PharmD students. OSCEs are ideal for assessing clinical skills and competencies, while simulations are excellent for building clinical reasoning skills and providing a safe, controlled environment for students to practice complex clinical scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the learning objectives and the specific needs of the student. By combining both OSCEs and simulations, educators can provide a well-rounded and comprehensive learning experience for PharmD students.